jump to navigation

Gamespot has sold out December 29, 2006

Posted by Vishal Thyagarajan in Gaming.
1 comment so far

Best Xbox 360 game : Gears of War —> OK

Gamespot Game of the Year 2006 : Gears of War —> WTF?!?

I certainly expected better from Gamespot. Being among the largest and most respected gaming websites in the world, they certainly need to set better standards. Take a look at the nominations. They include Okami, Bully, Company of Heroes, Oblivion, Twilight Princess and Final Fantasy XII apart from Gears of War and a few others. Now I know Gears of War is a very popular game, and it has single handedly helped boost the Xbox 360 sales to a staggering extent, but just ignoring the likes of Oblivion and Twilight Princess (both didn’t really impress with the gamespot awards, winning just one award each) both of which, in many ways far beyond the comprehension of the dills at Gamespot, far superior to Gears of War. You have to see and play Oblivion to believe it. Twilight Princess carries the most successful gaming series, Zelda, to greater heights. Many say it is among the best Zelda games ever created. And that, for the uninitiated is saying A LOT! Although it didn’t quite need Twilight Princess to boost sales, the Nintendo Wii nevertheless sold out in no time.

For a Zelda game to be hailed as the best (IGN rated Twilight Princess as the best ever created, beating even the all-time greatest “Ocarina of Time”) is a feat of astounding proportions. That a Zelda game beats every other Zelda created before it beats by a mile whatever Gears of War has done/can do. Twilight Princess is universally acclaimed by a lot of websites as among the greatest games ever made. Gamespot gave it a score of 8.8 on 10. Beats me. The reviewer, Jeff Gerstman was, perhaps the wrong person to review the game. He never was for giving the Zelda games their due. Complaining of really trivial and oft-times non-existent “flaws” he goes on and on about how the controls feel tacked on. Controls “tacked on” on a Wii?!? Why don’t we put it this way – Jeff Gerstmann can’t figure out the Wii-mote. That’s closer to the truth.

Oblivion, I can give you more first-hand information about. That it does not receive Game of the Year is a sacrilege to the Elder scrolls games, pioneers of sorts in gameworld design and complete immersion therein. This was, probably, most apparent in Morrowind, the predeccesor to Oblivion, where the game just took you into the world. Oblivion has vastly improved on Morrowind and while eliminating the occasional bugs and gameplay issues, has really set the highest standards in terms of both graphics and gameplay (Bethesdha’s “Radiant AI” is vastly underappreciated. It’s a leap toward the future). Why it shouldn’t receive Game of the Year beats me.

Or maybe it doesn’t..

I’ll tell you why Oblivion didn’t win GotY. It was released in March. People have played it to death, to the point of being confronted by a proportionately difficult progressive AI during the mid stages of the game, and were somehow thick enough to find fault with this. Plus, Oblivion is a role playing game – probably the least beginner friendly genre. As opposed to Gears of War, which is a shooter – accessible in a pick-up-and-play sort of a way shooters are. This hardly amounts to anything. You can’t award GotY to a game just because it’s a shooter. Gears of War was released a month back after much hype. The hype worked. People fell for the gig. They brought the game in droves. Being the great game that it is (I’m not taking anything from the game as such), what it did was completely dominate the gaming scene for a month. To the point of blindsiding one and all toward previous games. Enter December end, and your adrenaline is pumping with the latest mission from Gears of War. Best game of the year? Gears of War, man! Without a doubt! I haven’t felt this good in a long time…

How long, though? Months? Weeks? Days? Yeah, the last time you were captivated by Twilight Princess. Or completely mersmerised by the sprawling world of Oblivion. And so on and so forth.. What do we do then? Game of the Year? Gears of War. Only a month old, just fresh from the thrill of playing it. Oblivion? Yeah it was a great game when it came. Well, I’ve finished it, and it doesn’t look as rosy now. Twilight princess? Wow! The Wii is great! Zelda is great! But man, nothing can beat this pure adrenaline rush I’m having now.

You moron, you had the very same adrenaline rush when you played Zelda! You were spellbound in the very same way when you first played Oblivion! Just because you’ve finished a game, doesn’t mean it’s not as good as the game you are playing. Or just played. I can’t believe Gamespot fell for the gig. I was hoping for an honourable mention of Gears of War, and the title clash between Oblivion and Twilight Princess. Gamespot has sold out. They no longer command the same kind of respect from me. It’s a black day.

Procrastination club to be formed soon December 22, 2006

Posted by Vishal Thyagarajan in General, Un-news.
2 comments

More later.

College professor to launch “Popular Fluid Dynamics” December 19, 2006

Posted by Vishal Thyagarajan in Un-news.
6 comments

Mr. Y.K. Sabapathy, senior lecturer in one of the more popular engineering colleges in the city, launched a new “ultra-tech” magazine Popular Fluid Dynamics in a low-key press function yesterday. Amidst minimal fanfare, attended only by family and friends and no one from the press, Mr. Sabapathy cut the ceremonial ribbon to open the first copy of the magazine; and in a touching gesture, handed the first copy to his wife for free! One and all were touched by this gesture and applauded greatly, before scrambling to receive their own complimentary copies.

Later, Mr. Sabapathy revealed more about the magazine to the only reporter who bothered to ask him. “People are attaching undue importance to Popular Mechanics. That magazine is full of irrelevant nonsense. I can’t even find a simple mechanics concept – like, say path of a projectile, explained in any of the editions. How can a magazine about mechanics, and a self proclaimed popular one at that, not even talk about key mechanics concepts?”, he demanded, much to the bemusement of the reporter, who was an avid fan of Jay Leno, and hence, Popular Mechanics.”

Further expounding on the relevance of the magazine, Mr. Sabapathy, who teaches Fluid Dynamics, enlightened. “Fluid Dynamics is the essence of everything now. The relevance of fluid mechanics in the modern world is significant and cannot be ignored. Fluid Dynamics is tired of playing second fiddle to mechanics”, he said, essentially saying the same thing thrice.

Asked what he planned to propagate to the audience through Popular Fluid Dynamics, he was quick to answer. “Popular Fluid Dynamics will in a nutshell explain the underlying concepts that govern dynamic fluids, like Gatorade”, he said letting one slip. “The first edition will contain detailed proof of the all-important and fundamental theorem of Fluid Dynamics – the Bernoulli theorem. The alternate proof is also included”, he adds.

Asked about the kind of appeal the magazine would likely generate, Mr. Sabapathy was all hope and confidence. “I’m hoping the magazine will appeal to the wider masses. See how wide a readership Popular Mechanics subscribes to! And the best part is, it’s trash! So hopefully, more people will see how Popular Fluid Dynamics is more relevant and ditch the former. Who knows, maybe after the magazine has gained some initial success, we can include a David Letterman column, continuing with the tradition of roping in late night talk show hosts with oversized chins, in popular tech magazines”, he rambled on, apparently unaware that the reporter who had asked him the question in the first place, had long since dozed off.

When the reporter suddenly snapped awake, he quickly apologised. Mr. Sabapathy, jovial as ever, said : “That’s alright. I know you were listening. Just like the students in my class who pretend to be sleeping, but are actually intently listening to my lectures.”

What this win DOESN”T mean December 19, 2006

Posted by Vishal Thyagarajan in Sports.
add a comment

India have finally won their first test in South Africa. And if things keep going this smooth, India should take their first series victory in South Africa. A damn good performance by the test team, once castigated for its more than terrible overseas performance. Headingley, Adelaide, Jamaica, and now Johannesburg have become important places. I’m happy that we are winning test matches because I believe it is in test matches that true cricket is being tested/honed/displayed. One day matches are good for kicks but in the end it’s just an extended 20-20 match, to put it, possibly, in a fresher perspective. All and sundry can hit form and do well with a bit of luck. And luck sure does play what can be a significant role in ODI and 20-20 matches. They’re more of a batsman’s game. Whereas test cricket is a bowler’s game. The only way to win is bowl out the opposition atleast once. The consistency of the bowler is tested; and the perseverance and determination of the batsman is tested. Test cricket is just what the name suggests. It’s a real test of the cricketing skills overall. You can play badly and still manage to sneak in a win in ODIs; but this doesn’t happen in tests, if so only very rarely.

Now what I’m getting at with all this, is that I’ve heard one and all [yeah including the commentators]  rave about what a remarkable turnaround this has been; following the disastrous one day series. What a comeback! What a revival! and so on and so forth..

Herein lies my point. As a one day team, we are probably no better now than we were just a couple of weeks back. That is to say, if we were to play a one day match now, there’s a good chance we’d get thrashed again. Of course, I’m not saying it’ll happen, but the point here is that one-day performance does not really translate into tests, and vice versa. The two forms of the game require a different set of skills, tactics, and fitness levels. We never really had any major problems in tests. We are winning a fair number of tests and are in fairly good, consistent form. The same is not true in one dayers. We had a terrible run at the Champions trophy which continued in this series. As a one day team, we still have several issues to sort out. We are not yet ready for the world cup. This test win does not necessarily mean a great improvement in one day performance. The game doesn’t work like that.

That said, India’s one day form ought to get better. This one of the worst slumps we’ve had in years. One would certainly hope that things can only get better from here, especially in light of the ever-so-closely-looming world cup.

Telugu movies are the best December 18, 2006

Posted by Vishal Thyagarajan in General.
5 comments

You got to give it to Telugu movies though. They clearly fall in the “so bad that they’re good” category.

video spotted at http://www.stardonic.com You might like the place. Check it out.

What McGrath needs December 18, 2006

Posted by Vishal Thyagarajan in Sports.
2 comments

Mick Jagger got it right when he called McGrath a bastard. I know just what he needs. He needs Sreesanth. You dare him to mouth at Sreesanth. Andre Nel did, yesterday, and found out that Sreesanth was quite enjoying himself out there. Can’t blame him though. Nel was asking for it.

The Ashes are regained December 18, 2006

Posted by Vishal Thyagarajan in Sports.
add a comment

Man..England blew it. They lost it right when they let Gilchrist get into his rampage. A hundred runs prevented from his bat would have made a huge difference, especially considering the way England played the better part of the second innings. I watched the whole of Ian Bell and Alastair Cook’s 170 run gritty partnership. And I can tell you, had the target been 400-odd, it would have been a much different game. 557 is quite on the other side of impossible, and that has an effect on the minds of the chasers. And with England, probably more than any other team, that’s going to make a big difference. That they got to 350 with such an impossible total to chase down and with enormous pressure of losing the Ashes, suggests that they were well capable of a win had the target been cut down by 100-150 runs or so. England’s second innings was one of grit, not so much of flamboyant brilliance or anything [except for some brilliant shots by Flintoff in the morning]. The “Ashes moment” was effectively sealed when Warne, being the super-human that he is, got Flintoff. After then it was only a matter of timne before the inevitable happened. Once again, Kevin Pietersen was left at the crease with 60 and unbeaten. He must be feeling the worst.

Australia have the services of four super-humans [They can't be normal human beings, c'mon] in the form of Ponting, Hussey, Warne and McGrath and clearly thrashed England badly in the series. They won’t give ground. Obviously they’ll go for a whitewash, but England have pride to play for, and I for one will be hoping they win atleast one.

I’m disappointed, pissed, and angry at England. They should have taken the second test, and saved the third. But I’ll be hoping they’ll win atleast one of the last two, all the same.

All is not dark though. I’m getting ready to celebrate India’s inevitable win later today. We need to take 5 more wickets, and they need to get to 400 runs. The latter is pretty much an impossibility in the kind of wicket at the Wanderers. We have two whole days to get 5 wickets. I’m betting we need just one session. It’ll be a well deserved win. More later.

Redemption on the cards December 14, 2006

Posted by Vishal Thyagarajan in Sports.
add a comment

The first India – South Africa test match begins tomorrow. After the nightmarish one day series whitewash, made worse by the complete lack of form of the batsmen (except maybe Dravid and Dhoni), one would think a comeback of sorts is due. And I don’t think it’s foolish to expect one either. The current Indian batting lineup is superb in terms of raw talent, and not half bad either in terms of experience either (Sachin, Dravid, Ganguly, Laxman, Sehwag). It’s essentially the same “fabled Indian middle order” that was not too long ago considered one of the strongest in the world. It is really sad, in this light that we go into this series as underdogs and with no considerable momentum. The one day drubbing is past, and tests are much different games. The key is to play sensibly and not try too many things. Sehwag and Sachin must at any cost regain their form and confidence respectively. Ganguly must try to play through the initial phase of short pitched deliveries that will no doubt be hurled at him. Laxman needs to hang in there and get in the groove. Dravid (it would be unfair to ask too much of him) needs just to keep a cool head. It is possible that the problems plaguing the Indian batting may be overcome in a single, long innings where all the key players spend time in the middle and get into some kind of form. It’s not really a far cry either. Once the Indian batsmen hit some kind of form and are able to dictate the flow of the match (as they are very well capable of), then we shall more than make up for the one day series debacle. The bowlers are hitherto pretty much doing their bit satisfactorily, although some fine-tuning is definitely in order, especially with Pathan. It’s just the batting that has to make a complete turnaround. And we are more than capable of acheiving that.

It’s time to support the team afresh, now when they need it the most, rather than give up hope in the light of the one day series. Redemption is due.

Ashley Giles’ cricketing days are over December 14, 2006

Posted by Vishal Thyagarajan in Sports.
add a comment

Yup. He might as well scope out a good retirement home, find a quiet comfortable job and take rest. Monty Panesar (anagram : Parmesan Tony) is in town. The first seven balls he bowled were enough for me to base a reasonable prediction that he has a long and bright future. Boy, can he turn the ball! The way he bowled Langer in his seventh ball was a rocker. The first Englishman to get a 5 wicket haul at the WACA, Perth in his ashes debut. Watch out for him.

PS : Watch out though. If Monty Panesar can get the ball to turnso much, then Warne has the potential to land the ball at the boundary and turn it back to the stumps.

Batman and Robin in two lines December 12, 2006

Posted by Vishal Thyagarajan in Uncategorized.
2 comments

You don’t have to sit through the movie everytime. Here’s a super-condensed version of it.

Arnold Scwarzenegger : Ice to neet you.

Producers : We may have created the worst movie in history.

This and more here. Cheers!